Add typos to CI#441
Merged
TheDan64 merged 4 commits intoTheDan64:masterfrom Sep 16, 2023
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
@TheDan64, this PR bundles the adding |
TheDan64
reviewed
Sep 14, 2023
| @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ | |||
| [default] | |||
Owner
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What's with the underscore prefix? Shouldn't it be .typos.toml?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is so that the typos utility treats it as a configuration file.
Contributor
Author
|
Glad to help! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I added the
typosutility to CI, and simplified the enum variants in theBuilderErrorfrom #436 .Description
I added the
typosutility to CI (and an exclude file).I also removed the
GEPErroras it did not make sense and the 2 othersGEPPointeeandGEPIndexfit better. The 2 lines which usedGEPErrorhave been replaced to use more the descriptive variants.Related Issue
This is related to #438.
It also resolves what @marcospb19 raised in #436.
How This Has Been Tested
CI, including my new addition to it, is passing.
Checklist